lcp
We have detected you are using Internet Explorer. To provide the best and most secure experience, please use a modern browser as we do not support Internet Explorer.

Assessing and Recommending Mental Health Apps

02 October 2018 - Julia Reynolds

There are many thousands of mental health apps available – the question is where to start and how to select them?

Where to begin

When considering apps to improve my own health and wellbeing or to assist clients in my practice, I want to know whether the app is likely to be safe, effective and engaging to use. Privacy and data security are also important. Relatively few apps provide good information about what information they collect and what they do with the information. Some have no privacy policy and some have privacy policies that are inaccessible or incomplete.

Apps come and go very quickly and many are of questionable quality, When I am looking for an app, I first pick out some apps that seem credible and worth investing further time in examining. Finding a mental health app that works.

Portals can help

Online portals can be good places to start, especially at the initial screening stage. Portals are directory sites that set quality criteria and only list apps that meet those criteria. Different portals use different criteria and these are usually explained on the “about” page of the site.

Community-facing portals

Some portals are designed for the general public to use such as:

  • the United Kingdom’s NHS Apps Library for general health apps
  • Australia has some specialist mental health portals for members of the public, including:
    • the Head to Health site - this lists apps (and other online mental health resources, funded by government or that contain government content
    • Reachout site’s Tools and Apps page which lists apps that have been professionally reviewed and can be used and recommended with confidence

There are also two app portals based in the USA that may be of particular interest to clinicians:

  • PsyberGuide is designed for the general public but is helpful to clinicians because, for each app, PsyberGuide provides information about its credibility, user experience and transparency (whether it provides information about data security and privacy)
  • Mindtools.io addresses similar areas for each app and incorporates additional information about qualities that may interest clinicians (such as therapeutic persuasiveness and alliance) and provides “notes to clinicians” which suggest how each app might be used in therapy.

Use these sites to put together an initial list of potential apps that interest you, then have some fun putting them through their paces!

Julia Reynolds
Julia Reynolds

Julia Reynolds MPsych(Clin), MAPS, is Clinical Psychologist and e-hub Clinical Services Manager, Centre for Mental Health Research, ANU.

Get Medcast Plus

Become a member and get unlimited access to 100s of hours of premium education.

Learn more
Related News
Business skills: menopause in the MBS

Medcast Medical Education Team

Brand icon

MBS item number 695 came into effect on 1st July 2025. This new item number remunerates GPs for comprehensive assessment and management of menopause-related symptoms. Learn what you need to know about MBS item 695 with this fact sheet, including eligibility criteria and practice tips. 30mins each of RP and EA CPD with the quiz.

10 mins READ
Non-invasive prenatal testing/screening (NIPT/S) - clinical fact sheet and MCQ

PRECISE Education Team

Brand icon

An increasing number of pregnant patients are seeking advice from their GP about prenatal genetic testing. This FastTrack covers non-invasive prenatal testing/screening, including how it works, indications, limitations, and different types of testing panels. 30mins each of RP and EA CPD available.

10 mins READ
Wearables and AF: how smart are smartwatches?

Quality Use of Medicines Alliance

Brand icon

Wearables with PPG or ECG capabilities can identify episodes of irregular heart rhythms suggestive of AF, but should not replace traditional methods of diagnosis, such as a 12-lead ECG. Evidence of accuracy and positive predictive values from prospective, comparative trials involving older populations are limited, and the potential for inconclusive results remains a concern based on current trial findings. Their utility may be highest for symptomatic individuals or those at risk of developing AF.

10 mins READ