lcp
We have detected you are using Internet Explorer. To provide the best and most secure experience, please use a modern browser as we do not support Internet Explorer.

Are learning styles a myth?

24 February 2016 - A/Prof Stephen Barnett

As conscientious medical educators, we are always on the look-out for ways to further assist our registrars with their educational needs. Both those that struggle and those that do well endure our insistence on formulating individual learning plans. Compliance with creating plans that seem to provide a meaningful and worthwhile contribution to the registrars’ learning seems to be a battle much of the time, even with the motivated. And, with those that struggle, a battle on a larger scale. In search of ways to make individual learning meaningful there has been a focus on individual learning styles.

Evaluating the styles and helping educators and/or learners to tailor their input to meet these various styles has become a topic of much discussion and has generated much commercial interest. A quick google search of “learning styles” in 2015 will rapidly yield you 25, 100, 000 entries on the topic in 0.32 seconds, an overwhelming amount of information by any measure. As I have tried to plough through the chaff looking for some wheat in this area recently I was beginning to wonder about the utility and validity of a field of interest that proposes the need for identifying individual variation and then proceeds to systematically place people into stylistic boxes? And, apart from the interest of knowing that you have a preference for kinaesthetic learning, how does that actually assist you to learn?

The dance of the dermatomes might have been helpful in medical school but applying similar methods to the complex GP curriculum might be a little challenging. But I digress! In my search I did come across this interesting article co-written by the educator who wrote one of the original papers on the subject area which has come to be known as and perhaps oversimplified as “learning styles”. I was interested to read his critique of the direction that his research has been taken. I wonder how his reflections should inform our practice as medical educators? And, if not learning style analysis, then what other methods can we use to assist our registrars find effective ways to foster their individual learning? Does anyone use learning style assessments? What do you think of their efficacy? Is there any good quality research on whether knowing this affects learning outcomes? Interested in everyone’s thoughts.

A/Prof Stephen Barnett
A/Prof Stephen Barnett

Stephen is a GP Supervisor, Medical Educator, GP academic and Medical Director of Medcast. He has completed a PhD on Virtual Communities of Practice in GP Training.

Get Medcast Plus

Become a member and get unlimited access to 100s of hours of premium education.

Learn more
Related News
James presents with acute shortness of breath and a wheeze during a summer soccer match - clinical opal

Susan Helmrich

James, a university student with a history of seasonal allergic rhinitis, presents with sudden respiratory distress following exposure to grass pollen during a soccer game shortly before a summer thunderstorm. Could this be thunderstorm asthma?

5 mins READ
Antidepressants in older adults: handle with CARE

Quality Use of Medicines Alliance

Brand icon

Explore patient-centred strategies for managing antidepressant use in older adults using the mnemonic CARE as a framework for effective decision-making, monitoring, and deprescribing. Learn how the Quality Use of Medicines Alliance promotes safer, tailored approaches to mental health management in older populations.

5 mins READ
Essential guide to DVA billing

Dr Catherine Eltringham

Brand icon

Navigating the world of Department of Veterans' Affairs (DVA) billing can seem daunting. This concise guide provides general practitioners (GPs) with essential information on claiming for key DVA services, incentive payments, and compensation claim paperwork, ensuring accurate and efficient processing of your claims.

10 mins READ