lcp
We have detected you are using Internet Explorer. To provide the best and most secure experience, please use a modern browser as we do not support Internet Explorer.

Are learning styles a myth?

24 February 2016 - A/Prof Stephen Barnett

As conscientious medical educators, we are always on the look-out for ways to further assist our registrars with their educational needs. Both those that struggle and those that do well endure our insistence on formulating individual learning plans. Compliance with creating plans that seem to provide a meaningful and worthwhile contribution to the registrars’ learning seems to be a battle much of the time, even with the motivated. And, with those that struggle, a battle on a larger scale. In search of ways to make individual learning meaningful there has been a focus on individual learning styles.

Evaluating the styles and helping educators and/or learners to tailor their input to meet these various styles has become a topic of much discussion and has generated much commercial interest. A quick google search of “learning styles” in 2015 will rapidly yield you 25, 100, 000 entries on the topic in 0.32 seconds, an overwhelming amount of information by any measure. As I have tried to plough through the chaff looking for some wheat in this area recently I was beginning to wonder about the utility and validity of a field of interest that proposes the need for identifying individual variation and then proceeds to systematically place people into stylistic boxes? And, apart from the interest of knowing that you have a preference for kinaesthetic learning, how does that actually assist you to learn?

The dance of the dermatomes might have been helpful in medical school but applying similar methods to the complex GP curriculum might be a little challenging. But I digress! In my search I did come across this interesting article co-written by the educator who wrote one of the original papers on the subject area which has come to be known as and perhaps oversimplified as “learning styles”. I was interested to read his critique of the direction that his research has been taken. I wonder how his reflections should inform our practice as medical educators? And, if not learning style analysis, then what other methods can we use to assist our registrars find effective ways to foster their individual learning? Does anyone use learning style assessments? What do you think of their efficacy? Is there any good quality research on whether knowing this affects learning outcomes? Interested in everyone’s thoughts.

A/Prof Stephen Barnett
A/Prof Stephen Barnett

Stephen is a GP Supervisor, Medical Educator, GP academic and Medical Director of Medcast. He has completed a PhD on Virtual Communities of Practice in GP Training.

Get Medcast Plus

Become a member and get unlimited access to 100s of hours of premium education.

Learn more
Related News
Business Skills: LARC in the MBS

Medcast Medical Education Team

Brand icon

From the 1st Nov 2025, updates to the MBS affect all GPs providing services related to long-acting reversible contraceptives. This FastTrack will get you up to date on which items attracted an increased rebate, the new item number, and how to avoid common compliance pitfalls. 30mins each of RP and EA CPD available with the quiz.

10 mins READ
Conjunctivitis - clinical fact sheet and MCQ

Medcast Medical Education Team

Brand icon

GPs are often faced with the presentation of a red, sticky eye. Even without a slit lamp, there are key points in your clinical assessment that can help to differentiate the causes of conjunctivitis and guide the appropriate management. Read the fact sheet then claim 30mins each of RP and EA CPD with the quiz.

15 mins READ
Co-billing and split billing: a practical guide for GPs

Medcast Medical Education Team

Brand icon

Co-billing and split billing are often a source of confusion for many GPs. This FastTrack clearly defines these two methods of billing, including examples, explanations of when it is and isn’t appropriate to co- or split bill, and common compliance pitfalls. 30 mins each RP and EA available with the quiz.

10 mins READ